Thursday, April 25, 2013

2013 NFL Mock Draft

One of these guys - Joeckel or Fisher - will go No. 1 to Kansas City. 

Ah... the 2013 NFL Draft comes to us tonight with a few huge questions. The biggest questions, in my eyes, are: What happens with the first two picks, and what will Philadelphia do at No. 4 if the Eagles don't find a trading partner. Those moves seemingly will shape how the draft goes.

With the Detroit Lions' pick at No. 5 the draft could get interesting. If the Lions take Dee Millner - what I said Detroit should do without a second of hesitation in my earlier post on Detroit's draft needs - it leaves BYU's Ziggy Ansah in a potential free fall or as a hotly-coveted player resulting in an early trade. If Detroit does indeed take Ansah (or if the below Top 5 makes up the NFL Draft's Top 5 in some order) then it leaves potential Top-5 guys like Millner or Dion Jordan there for the taking.

I've projected trades in the past and projecting a wrong trade just makes a projected mock look ridiculous. Therefore, here is the draft with no projected trades. Last year's Mock Draft didn't have great numbers, but it was pretty much on with all other "experts" in the field. It nailed 22 of 32 eventual first rounders, pegged six  picks in the exact spot and seven with the exact team (I had Jacksonville taking Justin Blackmon wherever the Jags picked; Jacksonville moved up to No. 5 from No. 8 to get him). Again, very pedestrian numbers but that's the typical crap shoot of the NFL Draft.

Here's my best take on what 2013 will bring (with a few comments afterward):



  • PICK NO.
    1
    KC
    OT
    CENTRAL MICHIGAN
  • PICK NO.
    2
    JAC
    OT
    TEXAS A&M


    1. PICK NO.3
      OAK
      SHARRIF FLOYD
      DT
      FLORIDA
    2. PICK NO.
      4
      PHI
      LANE JOHNSON
      OT
      OKLAHOMA
    3. PICK NO.
      5
      DET
      ZIGGY ANSAH
      DE
      BYU
    4. PICK NO.
      6
      CLE
      GENO SMITH
      QB
      WEST VIRGINIA
    5. PICK NO.
      7
      ARI
      DION JORDAN
      DE
      OREGON
    6. PICK NO.
      8
      BUF
      TAVON AUSTIN
      WR
      WEST VIRGINIA
    7. PICK NO.
      9
      NYJ
      DEE MILLNER
      CB
      ALABAMA
    8. PICK NO.
      10
      TEN
      JONATHAN COOPER
      OG
      NORTH CAROLINA
    9. PICK NO.
      11
      SD
      CHANCE WARMACK
      OG
      ALABAMA
    10. PICK NO.
      12
      MIA
      D.J. FLUKER
      OT
      ALABAMA
    11. PICK NO.
      13
      NYJ
      KENNY VACCARO
      S
      TEXAS
    12. PICK NO.
      14
      CAR
      STAR LOTULELEI
      DT
      UTAH
    13. PICK NO.
      15
      NO
      JARVIS JONES
      OLB
      GEORGIA
    14. PICK NO.
      16
      STL
      ALEC OGLETREE
      ILB
      GEORGIA
    15. PICK NO.
      17
      PIT
      BARKEVIOUS MINGO
      DE
      LSU
    16. PICK NO.
      18
      DAL
      SHELDON RICHARDSON
      DT
      MISSOURI
    17. PICK NO.
      19
      NYG
      BJOERN WERNER
      DE
      FLORIDA ST.
    18. PICK NO.
      20
      CHI
      TYLER EIFERT
      TE
      NOTRE DAME
    19. PICK NO.
      21
      CIN
      ERIC REID
      FS
      LSU
    20. PICK NO.
      22
      STL
      SYLVESTER WILLIAMS
      DT
      NORTH CAROLINA
    21. PICK NO.
      23
      MIN
      MANTI TE'O
      LB
      NOTRE DAME
    22. PICK NO.
      24
      IND
      D.J. HAYDEN
      CB
      HOUSTON
    23. PICK NO.
      25
      MIN
      XAVIER RHODES
      CB
      FLORIDA ST.
    24. PICK NO.
      26
      GB
      EDDIE LACY
      RB
      ALABAMA
    25. PICK NO.
      27
      HOU
      KEENAN ALLEN
      WR 
      CALIFORNIA 
    26. PICK NO.
      28
      DEN
      KEVIN MINTER
      LB
      LSU
    27. PICK NO.
      29
      NE
      RYAN NASSIB*
      QB
      SYRACUSE.
    28. PICK NO.
      30
      ATL
      MATT ELAM
      FS
      FLORIDA
    29. PICK NO.
      31
      SF
      jamar taylor
      CB
      boise st.
    30. PICK NO.
      32
      BAL
      JONATHAN CYPRIEN
      SS






      FLORIDA INT'L


    *The Patriots will NOT take QB Ryan Nassib at No. 29. That is one spot (or at the very least close to a spot) that some team will trade back into the first round to get "their guy." Maybe the Browns don't take Geno Smith at No. 6 or maybe the Raiders and Cardinals mortgage the future to get a shot at Nassib. 

    Honestly, once the draft gets past No. 15 everything will get crazy. From 22 on down everything is a guess equivalent to dart throwing. I do believe these should be all the first rounders (though a few WRs (Tennessee's Cordarrelle Patterson and Clemson's DeAndre Hopkins) could slip in. I couldn't find players I would drop, however. What it means is that some teams (are you listening, Detroit?) might have a shot at guys like Matt Elam, Jamar Taylor and Jonathan Cyprien early in Round 2. That is in addition to Desmond Trufant who very easily could be a first rounder.

    THE STREAK LIVES: With Eddie Lacy going to Green Bay at No. 26 the streak of a running back being drafted in the first round survives. The last NFL Draft without a first-round RB: 1963. (There were only 14 first round picks in that draft but the point remains clear).

    THE STREAK DIES: For the first time since 1953 no Big Ten player will go in the first round. That's a pretty telling statistic. The conference's best chance for that streak to survive: OSU DT Johnathan Hankins (currently ranked the No. 13 defensive lineman by NFL.com's grading) or Purdue DT Kawann Short (16th).  I could see a team liking either - they're both 6-3 and 320 and 299 pounds, respectively - more than guys like Bjoern Werner or Cornellius Carradine.

    2013 NFL Draft: Lions Draft Needs

    Every so often a really, really good team has a really, really bad year and ends up with a high draft pick in the following season. That's what I believe happened with the Detroit Lions in 2012.

    I should preface that by saying a really good NFL team can easily go 7-9, 8-8, or 9-7 in a given year. The Lions were a lucky 10-6 team in 2011 when a lot of things went right. The team was even more unlucky last year in falling to 4-12. In reality, both teams probably should have been closer to the 8-8 mark based on talent.

    It's why I think the team takes a big leap this season as long as the draft yields some of those necessary pieces.


    There is your basic Lions draft board with no original fourth rounder but added compensatory picks at the end of the fourth and seventh rounds, respectively.

    While I would definitely say, of the nine "possible positions of need" the above chart kind of hits the main needs the order is off (if that is the projected order of need). 

    Lions fans would love to see Dee Milliner in Honolulu Blue (AP). 
    If I were the Lions GM... I would focus on the defensive secondary in the first two rounds. Period. Adding a corner (Alabama's Dee Milliner) with the No. 5 pick and coming back with a safety (LSU's Eric Reid or South Carolina's D.J. Swearinger) with the 36th pick gives a horrific secondary a bright look for the future. Now, I realize the Lions added Glover Quin in free agency and resigned Louis Delmas but I like taking a major weakness and making it a major strength rather than just making it serviceable. That's why I like a safety in Round 2.

    Then I would address the defensive line in Round 3. I don't see a huge need at defensive line with the signing of Jason Jones, a five-year NFL vet out of Eastern Michigan and the solid emergence of Willie Young. (I said much of last year that I thought Young would be the main reason why the Lions did not resign Cliff Avril. I don't think it was the reason but I do think it played a factor). Still, seeing as how Detroit likes to rotate its defensive ends then adding MSU's DE William Gholston (6-6, 281-lb), LSU's DE Sam Montgomery (6-3, 262-lb DE) or Illinois' DE Michael Buchanan (6-5, 255-lb) makes perfect sense.

    There are still solid tackles on Day 3, especially since outside of Eric Fisher and Luke Joeckel, both projected to both go in the Top 4, ever tackle has "some question mark." 

    Remember, while he fell into their laps last year the Lions did take Iowa OT Riley Reiff. A projected Top-10 pick the solid Reiff fell to No. 23. The Lions gladly snapped him up. He's a tackle who can also play guard. But taking another tackle the following year just doesn't make sense (unless you are the 49ers and have no pressing needs and have the luxury to do whatever it is you'd like). 

    For Lions fans, my best-case scenario for you is that that once empty draft board looks like this on Saturday night:


    Naturally, since I'm not the GM nor can I clam to be a NFL Mock Draft expert this is not likely anything close to what the Lions will do. Detroit will probably go with a lineman in Round 1 and even Round 2. If Detroit takes a LB early that makes sense. But as I stated before, this is how I could see the Lions draft going (sans potential trades) and I believe Detroiters would have to be very, very happy.

    Wednesday, April 10, 2013

    Defensive Score Sheet: NCAA Championship - Louisville vs. Michigan


    It was a magical ride for the Wolverines that fell 40 minutes short of glory.

    Done in by their defense (specifically the lack of rebounding and giving Louisville chance after chance on offense) Michigan lost in a classic NCAA title game to Louisville, 82-76.

    Here's the defensive score sheet for both teams with some notes that follow:


    What Michigan really needed was someone to have a Peyton Siva-like game. Siva was tremendous for Louisville, the hands-down defensive MOP if such an award was given.

    Instead, Michigan got one noteworthy defensive performance. Glenn Robinson III was outstanding. He numbers would have been even better with a few more defensive rebounds. That said, he forced a turnover and was responsible for eight missed field goals (nearly 25 percent of Louisville's bricks). The problem was that Michigan's guards couldn't defend and Mitch McGary's foul trouble hurt his aggressiveness. When McGary is in foul trouble he can't play with the reckless abandon that makes him the potential high NBA draft pick many envision. He played tentative and was burned by Gorgui Dieng time and time again (It also hurt that Dieng decided it was a good game to find his here-today, gone-tomorrow mid-range game).

    Against the No. 1 defense in the land Michigan's offense was spectacular. It's defense, however, looked like one ranked in the 30s. (Michigan entered the tournament ranked 53rd in Kempom and peaked at No. 35 before the title game. It finished the year ranked No. 39).

    All in all it was a fabulous (see what I did there?) year for the Wolverines. I can guarantee if all four studs come back Michigan will win it all next season. However, with Trey Burke and Tim Hardaway Jr. pretty much locks to go pro it will come down to Glenn Robinson III and Mitch McGary (if both return) to help lead Michigan back to the tournament's second weekend and beyond.

    Monday, April 8, 2013

    NCAA National Championship Preview: Michigan vs. Louisville

    (Originally posted at JustCoverBlog on April 8, 2010)


    WebberTO
    The last time Michigan was in standing 40 minutes from a national title was 20 years and three days ago. That was, of course, the infamous “time out” game against North Carolina.
    (If you’re unfamiliar – and if you are you’re probably not reading this, but here goes anyway – Michigan’s Chris Webber called a time out with 11 seconds remaining and the Wolverines trailing 73-71. The problem: Michigan was out of time outs. The technical foul resulted in two free throws – both makes – and the ball back to North Carolina. Michigan lost the title game 77-71).
    Nevertheless, as many bad memories as Michigan fans have from that game, getting back to basketball’s title game is something to celebrate in itself. According to Kenpom Michigan road to the Final Four was the eighth hardest (out of 44 teams) in the 11 years he’s been filling our brains with tempo-free statistics. If Michigan wins the title, I’m curious where the Wolverines’ run would rank out of the 11 champions.
    While it can be argued that these aren’t exactly the two best teams in the country playing for the title (I would still say Indiana and Kansas are better overall teams than Michigan) there is no doubt both teams are elite and either is more than worthy of being crowned the national champions. The Big Ten, even Michigan State believe it or not, is likely pulling for Michigan tonight to snap the “Big Ten hasn’t won a national championship since Michigan State’s 2000″ narrative that has gotten old quickly. People ignore the fact that since 2000 the Big Ten’s eight Final four teams trails only the ACC’s nine. (If you include 2000 both the Big Ten and ACC have 10 Final Four squads). So, it isn’t like the Big Ten’s lack of a champion in the past 12-plus years somehow reflects a poor conference; in fact, statistics and tournament runs show the Big Ten has as good of teams as any conference in the country year in and year out. It just never seems to have the best team.
    Could 2013 be different? It’s up to Michigan, an under-seeded squad trying to become just the second No. 4 seed ever (Arizona, 1997) to win the national title.
    Here's a big breakdown of Monday's title game in Atlanta (h/t to Kenpom):
    Michigan (31-7) vs. Louisville (34-5)
    Line: Louisville -4
    Kenpom Score: Louisville 71-66 (68%)
    Kenpom ranking: Michigan 5th, Louisville 1st
    Offensive efficiency: Michigan 121.7 (1st), Louisville 118.0 (5th)
    Defensive efficiency: Michigan 91.6 (32nd), Louisville 82.4 (1st)
    eFG%: Michigan 54.4 (11th), Louisville 50.5 (92nd)
    TO%: Michigan 14.5 (1st), Louisville 18.4 (86th)
    OR%: Michigan 32.5 (139th), Louisville 38.1 (17th)
    FT Rate: Michigan 27.9 (338th), Louisville 40.0 (68th)
    Tempo: Michigan 65.1 (207th), Louisville 66.8 (125th)
    This is the first time in the Kenpom era that the No. 1 offensive efficiency team (Michigan) is facing the No. 1 defensive efficiency team (Louisville) for the title. It’s hardly the first time, however, one team with either the best offense or best defense has reached the title game. In the previous 10 seasons there were four occasions where the No. 1 offense reached the championship game and two others where the No. 1 defense played on Monday night. 
    The No. 1 offenses are 4-0 in the title game (North Carolina in 2005, Florida in 2007, North Carolina in 2009 and Duke in 2010). The No. 1 defenses are 1-1 (Kansas lost in 2003 but won in 2008).
    Those No. 1 offenses went against, in order, the following defenses (*ranks after the title game): No. 11 Illinois (2005), No. 15 Ohio State (2007), No. 10 Michigan State (2009) and No. 5 Butler (2010). So, while it wasn’t exactly like going against the top defense in the country it wasn’t like those champions were facing this year’s 0-28 Grambling team ranked No. 347 in defensive efficiency (124.5 points per 100 possessions allowed).
    Something is going to have to give tonight, that’s for sure.
    There are three big keys to the game: Louisville’s pressure vs. Michigan’s ball handling, the two individual matchups of Mitch McGary vs. Gorgui Dieng and Trey Burke vs. Russ Smith, and Louisville’s 3-point shooting vs. Michigan’s 3-point defense.
    NCAA Basketball: NCAA Tournament-Michigan vs SyracuseLouisville’s pressure vs. Michigan’s ball handling: Not only is Michigan the best team in the country at not turning the ball over (giveaways on just 14.5 percent of possessions) but Trey Burke’s ability to keep calm in such situations and make the right decision much more often than not can’t be calculated. That said, Louisville forces turnovers on 27.3 possessions, second best in the country. (It’s worth noting VCU was No. 1, forcing TOs on 28.5 percent of possessions. Michigan, of course, throttled VCU 78-53 while committing 12 turnovers – 7 by Burke). 
    Louisville’s multiple-form press isn’t Arkansas’ 40 Minutes of Hell. In fact, sometimes the pressure is just to slow down a team’s pace and isn’t even trying to get a turnover. Other times it’s like an army invading a castle or an all-out blitz on the goal line in football where a turnover is the only goal.
    Recent visions of Michigan dealing with pressure immediately take us back to the final three minutes against Syracuse. Of course, Michigan was playing not to lose at that point while Syracuse was in desperation mode. That was a bad combination for the Wolverines who nearly blew a double-digit lead and looked like they hadn’t faced pressure the entire season. (Specifically, remember the play where Trey Burke was trapped right when he crossed half court and nearly threw the ball out of bounds before Tim Hardaway Jr. made a phenomenal right-place, right-time save?). Those plays will result in easy buckets for Louisville and the Cardinals are fortunate enough to be in this position.
    Wichita State was the better team for 34 minutes on Saturday. It might have been an upset in the record books but if you took names off jerseys you would have thought the Shockers were the Cardinals for most of the game. Nevertheless, Louisville found a way to survive and advance even though the press was unsuccessful for much of the game. Wichita State went 26 minutes and 13 seconds without a turnover at one point; that’s incredible in any game but almost a once-in-a-lifetime stat against a Rick Pitino defense.
    Louisville doesn’t have to force turnovers to win, but it would make it much easier for the Cardinals. Michigan doesn’t have to take excellent care of the ball to win but it would make things much easier for the Wolverines. This isn’t the be-all, end-all key, but it will definitely help shift the balance.
    McGaryMitch McGary vs. Gorgui Dieng: Both men will be at a disadvantage in certain spots. McGary faced the best shot-blocker in the country in Kansas’ Jeff Withey and fared quite well. Now, some would say McGary was the beneficiary of offensive rebounds off Withey blocked shots or shots Withey altered but couldn’t rebound. McGary was able to get by Withey on a few possessions but he’s a different type of shot blocker than Dieng. I think Dieng has the ability to block different-angled shots if that makes sense. Michigan will try to score with weird-angled shots to avoid Dieng’s excessive reach. Tis is where I think Dieng is at his best as he blocks shots that initially appear to be unblockable.
    Now, Dieng will be at a disadvantage because McGary will bang him around the post all night long. There won’t be a bigger sigh of relief during Monday’s game than from Dieng when Jon Horford comes in to spell McGary for a bit. Dieng will wear down against a bruiser so that is one thing Louisville will  have to monitor. If I’m Rick Pitino and I script offensive plays to start a game (I don’t believe he does) the first few plays are all post feeds to Dieng. If Louisville can get an early foul on McGary it’ll make him much less aggressive on defense (two fouls will force him to sit the rest of the first half and that would be huge for the Cardinals).
    Louisville can survive Michigan’s offensive attack without Dieng in the middle. It would be more difficult, but it’s definitely doable. Michigan can’t survive against Louisville’s defense without McGary roaming the post.
    RussSmithTrey Burke vs. Russ Smith: A matchup of arguably the best player in the country vs. the second best player in the country, in that order. That is, unless you’re Ken Pomeroy who has Russ Smith as his KPoy and Burke No. 2. Russdiculous has scored at least 20 points in all of Louisville’s tournament games but he’s far from the reason Louisville has reached the title game. Without Luke Hancock this is a Michigan-Wichita State matchup.
    Burke has been good but not great during Michigan’s run. Outside of his game-changing second half and overtime against Kansas Burke is shooting less than 25 percent from the field including a 1-for-8 performance against Syracuse. Now, Burke is helping his team in other ways but let’s not act like he’s Michigan’s MVP during this run; that’s McGary and there is no debate.
    Both Burke and Smith have the unique ability to carry their teams on their respective backs down the stretch. It’ll be interesting to see which one (or both) are doing it in the final three minutes tonight.
    Louisville’s 3-point shooting vs. Michigan’s 3-point defense: Louisville is not a great 3-point shooting team. It’s 32.9 percent accuracy is just 216th in the country. Kevin Ware was the team’s best 3-point shooter at 40.5 percent before his gruesome injury. Luke Hancock (37.9 percent) takes over the role. Smith is at 33.3 percent. The only other 3-point shooters – Wayne Blackshear (31.6 percent) and Peyton Siva (29.2 percent) are hardly guys you’re confident in from long range. Of course, based on the win over the Shockers Louisville might have found another clutch shooter in walk-on Tim Henderson.
    Michigan’s 3-point defense isn’t great but it’s good enough (32.2 percent) that Louisville is going to have to make some tough, contested threes to help the inside game. If Louisville isn’t hitting close to 33 percent of its triples tonight the Cardinals just won’t win. It might take a 9-for-27 performance but Louisville has to make some deep shots. Michigan’s big job is to challenge as much as possible and clean up the offensive glass.
    The Pick: I’ve gone 2-2 with my Michigan picks this postseason (Had South Dakota State +11.5 and Kansas -2 to go with Michigan -4.5 vs. VCU and -2.5 vs. Syracuse). That tells you how tough it has been to read this Michigan team with specific matchups. I’ll say this until I die: In tossup games always go with the team getting points. In the title game that’s Michigan.
    Michigan is also 5-0 ATS in the NCAA Tournament. Sometimes it’s not about being the best team in the country but the hottest team (see 2011 Connecticut). Remember, this same Michigan team closed the regular season 1-9 ATS. Louisville, on the other hand, closed the regular season 7-0 ATS but is just 3-2 ATS in the NCAA Tournament.
    coachesLVUMI have no idea if Michigan will win this game but I think it’s just as likely to win as Louisville. That’s why I think it’s a no brainer to take Michigan +4. The Wolverines have pretty close to a 50 percent chance to win the game, so take the free points. Michigan very much seems like a team of destiny – then again, we all said the same thing about Michigan State during the Spartans’ run to the title game in Detroit in 2009. Still, Michigan is playing so well right now that a close game seems inevitable. Expect to be sweating until the final buzzer whatever side of the line you play. Just don’t forget to enjoy the game.
    NCAA Tournament: 5-8 (it’s been madness, no doubt)
    2013 College Hoops Year-to-Date: 69-42-1
    2013 Year-to-Date: 77-45-1